The supporters argue quotas balance out men’s networks and “the-same-as-me-bias” against women in male jobs.
Opponents, on the other hand, many of which are women, believe the privileged selection process is counterproductive. They argue quotas undermine self-confidence of the position holder and increase the risk of criticism in the environment. Both consequences making it harder for the woman to earn respect.
What do I believe?
Over the last decade, I’ve changed my opinion on the subject and became a supporter of women’s quotas. Allow me to explain why.
The opponents lean on quite a number of hidden premises:
- All men get their jobs in a fair process, free from any biases.
- Quotas provide unfair advantages and result in dishonest success.
- If only you work hard enough, you will be rewarded.
- I have honestly earned my position without taking advantage of a quota.
- Being a leader equals being liked.
Let’s dismantle this
- Biases are human and can only be kept at bay with an extra portion of determination. As long as women haven’t crossed the Rubicon holding a decent percentage in the boardrooms, they remain disadvantaged.
- Quotas allow to be considered, not necessarily selected!
- I’m not being ironic: Men are adorable in their self-promoting skills. If women don’t learn to beat the drums by themselves, chances are they won’t strive.
- I’m surprised how often women resent other women’s successes. Girls, applaud each other! Hooray, one of us made it to the top!!!!
- If you aspire to a leading position, better brace for criticism. Leadership is a challenging job for all genders and identities.
What do you think?
Bring to mind your colleagues, superiors, CEOs, or directors. Men and women alike. How would you categorise them?
- Deserved the job / Doesn’t deserve the job
- Highly competent / mediocre
- Role model / Hopeless
- Inspiring leader / confusion creator
